Currently free during beta - premium features coming soon. Subscribe now to lock in early access.

arXiv: Designing Inclusive Crypto-Asset Dispute Resolution A Hybrid AI and Smart Contract Online Dispute Resolution Framework for Vulnerable Users

AI_SAFETY AI Security & Safety · · arxiv_cscr

AI Analysis

A new academic paper proposes a framework for resolving disputes in crypto-asset transactions using a hybrid system of artificial intelligence and smart contracts, specifically designed to protect vulnerable users. The framework, published on arXiv, outlines a structured online dispute resolution process where AI assists in triaging complaints and smart contracts automate certain enforcement actions, aiming to reduce costs and improve accessibility compared to traditional legal channels. It is a conceptual proposal, not a binding regulation, but it signals a growing focus on consumer protection within decentralized finance.

This publication is most relevant to crypto-asset service providers, exchanges, wallet developers, and any organisation operating under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). It also affects consumer protection bodies and dispute resolution firms that may need to adapt to automated mechanisms. While the paper does not change current legal obligations, it highlights potential future expectations for fair and accessible redress, particularly for retail investors and those with limited technical or financial literacy.

Compliance teams should monitor this development as an indicator of emerging best practices. They should assess their current complaint-handling procedures against the proposed AI and smart contract approach, particularly regarding transparency, data protection, and the handling of vulnerable users. It is advisable to conduct a gap analysis of existing dispute resolution mechanisms and consider piloting automated triage tools, while ensuring any such system remains compliant with MiCAR's conduct of business rules and the General Data Protection Regulation. No immediate regulatory action is required, but proactive evaluation is prudent.

Get notified about AI_SAFETY changes

Subscribe to our free weekly digest covering 24 compliance frameworks.